Comments on: 080210 MW http://alternativeathletics.com/2010/02/080210-mw/ Fri, 18 May 2012 17:24:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: Clint http://alternativeathletics.com/2010/02/080210-mw/comment-page-1/#comment-1919 Clint Tue, 16 Feb 2010 01:40:33 +0000 http://alternativeathletics.com/?p=1483#comment-1919 16:02M - Rx 16:02M – Rx

]]> By: Clint http://alternativeathletics.com/2010/02/080210-mw/comment-page-1/#comment-1915 Clint Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:30:54 +0000 http://alternativeathletics.com/?p=1483#comment-1915 16:07M - Rx 17:09W - 105DL 16:52M - Rx 16:07M – Rx
17:09W – 105DL
16:52M – Rx

]]> By: Clint http://alternativeathletics.com/2010/02/080210-mw/comment-page-1/#comment-1896 Clint Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:04:46 +0000 http://alternativeathletics.com/?p=1483#comment-1896 18:55M - 115, 18" 18:55M – 115, 18″

]]> By: Polly http://alternativeathletics.com/2010/02/080210-mw/comment-page-1/#comment-1866 Polly Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:16:07 +0000 http://alternativeathletics.com/?p=1483#comment-1866 You should of seen Sue on those Box jumps, she was awesome...good job. You should of seen Sue on those Box jumps, she was awesome…good job.

]]> By: Char http://alternativeathletics.com/2010/02/080210-mw/comment-page-1/#comment-1865 Char Tue, 09 Feb 2010 02:16:45 +0000 http://alternativeathletics.com/?p=1483#comment-1865 You guys are funny. You guys are funny.

]]> By: Robyn http://alternativeathletics.com/2010/02/080210-mw/comment-page-1/#comment-1864 Robyn Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:33:33 +0000 http://alternativeathletics.com/?p=1483#comment-1864 No worries, if it was going to bug me I wouldn't have answered. Thanks for looking out for me though, Ouch! No worries, if it was going to bug me I wouldn’t have answered. Thanks for looking out for me though, Ouch!

]]> By: Clint http://alternativeathletics.com/2010/02/080210-mw/comment-page-1/#comment-1863 Clint Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:15:37 +0000 http://alternativeathletics.com/?p=1483#comment-1863 OTH - First, Robyn had already posted hers when she signed up for a recent competition. I should have looked there first. Second 6 women's scores had been posted so guessing the 2 out of six leaves some ambiguity. Third, ask my wife of ten years, I have no tact. OTH –

First, Robyn had already posted hers when she signed up for a recent competition. I should have looked there first.

Second 6 women’s scores had been posted so guessing the 2 out of six leaves some ambiguity.

Third, ask my wife of ten years, I have no tact.

]]> By: Clint http://alternativeathletics.com/2010/02/080210-mw/comment-page-1/#comment-1862 Clint Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:12:47 +0000 http://alternativeathletics.com/?p=1483#comment-1862 14:21M - 135# (injured back) 14:05M - Rx 18:00W - Rx 17:25W - 65# 11:48M - Rx 13:59W - 95 16:35W - Rx 12:41M - Rx 17:40W - 76# 16:39W - 85# 21:49W - 105# 14:21M – 135# (injured back)
14:05M – Rx
18:00W – Rx
17:25W – 65#
11:48M – Rx
13:59W – 95
16:35W – Rx
12:41M – Rx
17:40W – 76#
16:39W – 85#
21:49W – 105#

]]> By: ouch, that ? hurt... http://alternativeathletics.com/2010/02/080210-mw/comment-page-1/#comment-1861 ouch, that ? hurt... Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:07:14 +0000 http://alternativeathletics.com/?p=1483#comment-1861 Dear Clint, That was a very personal, public question posed to Robyn and Susie..... Dear Clint,
That was a very personal, public question posed to Robyn and Susie…..

]]> By: Clint http://alternativeathletics.com/2010/02/080210-mw/comment-page-1/#comment-1860 Clint Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:55:01 +0000 http://alternativeathletics.com/?p=1483#comment-1860 we will put the first two girls as Rx 20:34W - Rx 11:58M - Rx 14:08M - Rx 19:27M - Rx we will put the first two girls as Rx
20:34W – Rx
11:58M – Rx
14:08M – Rx
19:27M – Rx

]]>